Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S7150 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6400

AMD FirePro S7150 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6400

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM FirePro S7150 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S7150 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro W6400 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2331MHz
Lower TDP (50W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S7150 +5%
3.768 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6400
3.58 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2016
Release Date
Jan 2022
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2331 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2331 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
32
Compute Units
12
2048
Shading Units
768
128
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
12
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

29.44 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
74.59 GPixel/s
117.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
111.9 GTexel/s
7.537 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
7.161 TFLOPS
3.768 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.580 TFLOPS
235.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
223.8 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
Navi 24
Tonga XT GL
GPU Variant
Navi 24 XL-W
GCN 3.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
5 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
50W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy