Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S10000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250

AMD FirePro S10000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S10000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock950MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S10000 +779%
3.405 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 250
0.387 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
Mar 2009
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
-
950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
16
28
Compute Units
-
1792
Shading Units
128
112
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.23 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.93 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
387.1 GFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
G92B
Zaphod
GPU Variant
G92-428-B1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
260 mm²

Board Design

375W
TDP
150W
750 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy