Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 2

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive and 512MB VRAM GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock950MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
1776 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S10000 Passive +7466%
3.405 TFLOPS
GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 2
0.045 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
Aug 2008
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
-
950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
2
28
Compute Units
-
1792
Shading Units
16
112
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.200 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.400 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.80 GFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
G96C
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
121 mm²

Board Design

375W
TDP
50W
750 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy