Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs AMD FirePro S9100

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs AMD FirePro S9100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive and 12GB VRAM FirePro S9100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Boost Clock950MHz
AMD FirePro S9100 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (12GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 240.0GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (225W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S10000 Passive
3.405 TFLOPS
FirePro S9100 +23%
4.219 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
Oct 2014
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
-
950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
512bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
28
Compute Units
40
1792
Shading Units
2560
112
TMUs
160
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.74 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
131.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.219 TFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.109 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Hawaii
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL40
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Board Design

375W
TDP
225W
750 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy