AMD FirePro RG220A vs NVIDIA T1000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro RG220A and 4GB VRAM T1000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro RG220A 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 50W)
NVIDIA T1000 's Advantages
Released 11 years late
Boost Clock1395MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
816 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro RG220A
0.08 TFLOPS
T1000
+3025%
2.5 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2010
Release Date
May 2021
FirePro Remote
Generation
Quadro Turing
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1065 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
1
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
80
Shading Units
896
8
TMUs
56
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
44.64 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
78.12 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.000 TFLOPS
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.500 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
78.12 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
M93
GPU Name
TU117
-
-
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.242 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
73 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
4.1
Shader Model
6.8
