AMD FirePro RG220A vs ATI FireGL V8600
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro RG220A and 1024MB VRAM FireGL V8600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro RG220A 's Advantages
Released 3 years late
Lower TDP (35W vs 159W)
ATI FireGL V8600 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
240 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro RG220A
0.08 TFLOPS
FireGL V8600
+450%
0.44 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2010
Release Date
May 2007
FirePro Remote
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
868 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR4
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
111.1GB/s
Render Config
1
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
80
Shading Units
320
8
TMUs
16
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.01 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.01 GTexel/s
-
-
-
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
440.3 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
35W
TDP
159W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
M93
GPU Name
R600
-
GPU Variant
R600 V8600
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
80 nm
0.242 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
73 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
4.0
