AMD FirePro RG220 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI355X
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro RG220 and 288GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI355X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro RG220 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 1400W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI355X 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (288GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (8.19TB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
19376 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro RG220
0.08 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI355X
+102050%
81.72 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2010
Release Date
Jan 2025
FirePro RG
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
288GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM3e
256bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
8.19TB/s
Render Config
1
Compute Units
304
-
-
-
80
Shading Units
19456
8
TMUs
1216
4
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1216
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
L3 Cache
256 MB
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2553.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
653.7 TFLOPS
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
81.72 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
81.72 TFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
1400W
200 W
Suggested PSU
1800 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
M93
GPU Name
Aqua Vanjaram X
-
-
-
TeraScale
Architecture
CDNA 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
3 nm
0.242 billion
Transistors
153 billion
73 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
N/A
