AMD FirePro RG220 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro RG220 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro RG220 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 75W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
816 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro RG220
0.08 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650
+3630%
2.984 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2010
Release Date
Apr 2019
FirePro RG
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1485 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1665 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2001 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
128.1GB/s
Render Config
1
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
80
Shading Units
896
8
TMUs
56
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
53.28 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
93.24 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.967 TFLOPS
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.984 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
93.24 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
M93
GPU Name
TU117
-
GPU Variant
TU117-300-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.242 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
73 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
4.1
Shader Model
6.6
