AMD FirePro RG220 vs AMD FirePro W600
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro RG220 and 2GB VRAM FirePro W600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro RG220 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 75W)
AMD FirePro W600 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
432 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro RG220
0.08 TFLOPS
FirePro W600
+860%
0.768 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2010
Release Date
Jun 2012
FirePro RG
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
1
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
80
Shading Units
512
8
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
48.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
M93
GPU Name
Cape Verde
-
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO GL
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.242 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
73 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.1
