AMD FirePro RG220 vs NVIDIA CMP 30HX
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro RG220 and 6GB VRAM CMP 30HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro RG220 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 125W)
NVIDIA CMP 30HX 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
1328 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro RG220
0.08 TFLOPS
CMP 30HX
+6183%
5.027 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2010
Release Date
Feb 2021
FirePro RG
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1530 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
336.0GB/s
Render Config
1
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
22
80
Shading Units
1408
8
TMUs
88
4
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
85.68 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
157.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.05 TFLOPS
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.027 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
157.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
125W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
M93
GPU Name
TU116
-
GPU Variant
TU116-100-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.242 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
73 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
4.1
Shader Model
6.8
