AMD FirePro RG220 vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro RG220 and 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro RG220 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 250W)
NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
4400 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro RG220
0.08 TFLOPS
CMP 170HX
+15687%
12.63 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2010
Release Date
Sep 2021
FirePro RG
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1140 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1458 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
1493GB/s
Render Config
1
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
70
80
Shading Units
4480
8
TMUs
280
4
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
280
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
180.5 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
50.53 TFLOPS
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
6.317 TFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
M93
GPU Name
GA100
-
GPU Variant
GA100-105F-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.242 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
73 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
8.0
4.1
Shader Model
N/A
