AMD FirePro M8900 vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro M8900 and 12GB VRAM RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro M8900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 110W)
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
6464 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro M8900
1.306 TFLOPS
RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation
+1792%
24.72 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2011
Release Date
Mar 2023
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1290 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1665 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
432.0GB/s
Render Config
12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
58
960
Shading Units
7424
48
TMUs
232
32
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
232
-
RT Cores
58
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
21.76 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
133.2 GPixel/s
32.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
386.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
24.72 TFLOPS
1306 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
24.72 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
386.3 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
110W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Blackcomb
GPU Name
AD104
Blackcomb XT GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.7 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
5.0
Shader Model
6.7
