Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro M8900 vs AMD Radeon HD 6550M

AMD FirePro M8900 vs AMD Radeon HD 6550M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro M8900 and 1024MB VRAM Radeon HD 6550M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro M8900 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
560 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon HD 6550M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (26W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro M8900 +172%
1.306 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 6550M
0.48 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2011
Release Date
Nov 2010
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Vancouver
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-II

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
12
Compute Units
5
960
Shading Units
400
48
TMUs
20
32
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

21.76 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.800 GPixel/s
32.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1306 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
480.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Blackcomb
GPU Name
Lexington
Blackcomb XT GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.7 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
26W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy