AMD FirePro M8900 vs AMD Radeon E9260 MXM
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro M8900 and 4GB VRAM Radeon E9260 MXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro M8900 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
64 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon E9260 MXM 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro M8900
1.306 TFLOPS
Radeon E9260 MXM
+64%
2.15 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2011
Release Date
Sep 2016
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1090 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s
Render Config
12
Compute Units
14
-
-
-
960
Shading Units
896
48
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
21.76 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.20 GPixel/s
32.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.150 TFLOPS
1306 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.150 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
134.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Blackcomb
GPU Name
Baffin
Blackcomb XT GL
GPU Variant
Baffin PRO
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.7 billion
Transistors
3 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.4
