AMD FirePro M8900 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro M8900 and 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3050 Max Q Refresh to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock990MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (144.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
1088 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro M8900
1.306 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 3050 Max Q Refresh
+210%
4.055 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2011
Release Date
Jul 2022
FirePro Mobile
Generation
GeForce 30 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
622 MHz
-
Boost Clock
990 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
96bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
144.0GB/s
Render Config
12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
960
Shading Units
2048
48
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
21.76 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
31.68 GPixel/s
32.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
63.36 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.055 TFLOPS
1306 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.055 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
63.36 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Blackcomb
GPU Name
GA107
Blackcomb XT GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.7 billion
Transistors
Unknown
212 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
5.0
Shader Model
6.6
