AMD FirePro M8900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro M8900 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 's Advantages
Released 9 years late
Boost Clock1485MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
64 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro M8900
1.306 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
+132%
3.041 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2011
Release Date
Apr 2020
FirePro Mobile
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1350 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1485 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
960
Shading Units
1024
48
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
21.76 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
47.52 GPixel/s
32.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.04 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.083 TFLOPS
1306 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.041 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
95.04 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Blackcomb
GPU Name
TU116
Blackcomb XT GL
GPU Variant
N18P-G61
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.7 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.0
Shader Model
6.6
