Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro M8900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M

AMD FirePro M8900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro M8900 and 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 415M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro M8900 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
912 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro M8900 +1260%
1.306 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 415M
0.096 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Apr 2011
Release Date
Sep 2010
FirePro Mobile
Generation
GeForce 400M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
960
Shading Units
48
48
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

21.76 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.000 GPixel/s
32.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1306 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
96.00 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
8.000 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
12W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Blackcomb
GPU Name
GF108
Blackcomb XT GL
GPU Variant
N11P-GV
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.7 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
5.0
Shader Model
5.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net