AMD FirePro M8900 vs Intel Arc A380M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro M8900 and 6GB VRAM Arc A380M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A380M 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2000MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
64 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro M8900
1.306 TFLOPS
Arc A380M
+213%
4.096 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2011
Release Date
Jan 2023
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Alchemist
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.1)
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1550 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
96bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
186.0GB/s
Render Config
12
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
960
Shading Units
1024
48
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
128
-
RT Cores
8
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
21.76 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
32.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
1306 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1024 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Blackcomb
GPU Name
DG2-128
Blackcomb XT GL
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.7 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.6
