AMD FirePro M6000 vs NVIDIA T600 Mobile
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro M6000 and 4GB VRAM T600 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA T600 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (40W vs 43W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro M6000
1.024 TFLOPS
T600 Mobile
+146%
2.527 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2012
Release Date
Apr 2021
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Turing-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
780 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
640
Shading Units
896
40
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
45.12 GPixel/s
32.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
78.96 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.053 TFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.527 TFLOPS
64.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
78.96 GFLOPS
Board Design
43W
TDP
40W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Heathrow
GPU Name
TU117
Heathrow XT GL
(216-0835033)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
