AMD FirePro M6000 vs AMD Radeon R7 A260
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro M6000 and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 A260 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro M6000 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 A260 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock980MHz
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro M6000
+36%
1.024 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 A260
0.752 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2012
Release Date
Jan 2014
FirePro Mobile
Generation
All-In-One
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
980 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
384
40
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.840 GPixel/s
32.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.52 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1024 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
752.6 GFLOPS
64.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
43W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Heathrow
GPU Name
Topaz
Heathrow XT GL
(216-0835033)
GPU Variant
Topaz XT
(216-0858020)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
1.55 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
125 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5
