AMD FirePro M6000 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Max-Q
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro M6000 and 12GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4080 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro M6000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 60W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1350MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
6784 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro M6000
1.024 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4080 Max Q
+1857%
20.04 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2012
Release Date
Jan 2023
FirePro Mobile
Generation
GeForce 40 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
795 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1350 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
336.0GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
58
640
Shading Units
7424
40
TMUs
232
16
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
232
-
RT Cores
58
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.0 GPixel/s
32.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
313.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
20.04 TFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
20.04 TFLOPS
64.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
313.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
43W
TDP
60W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Heathrow
GPU Name
AD104
Heathrow XT GL
(216-0835033)
GPU Variant
GN21-X9
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
4 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
295 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
