Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro M6000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M

AMD FirePro M6000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro M6000 and 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 415M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro M6000 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
592 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 43W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro M6000 +966%
1.024 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 415M
0.096 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Jul 2012
Release Date
Sep 2010
FirePro Mobile
Generation
GeForce 400M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
640
Shading Units
48
40
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.000 GPixel/s
32.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1024 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
96.00 GFLOPS
64.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
8.000 GFLOPS

Board Design

43W
TDP
12W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Heathrow
GPU Name
GF108
Heathrow XT GL (216-0835033)
GPU Variant
N11P-GV
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net