AMD FirePro M6000 vs Intel Arc Pro A60M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro M6000 and 8GB VRAM Arc Pro A60M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro M6000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 95W)
Intel Arc Pro A60M 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1300MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro M6000
1.024 TFLOPS
Arc Pro A60M
+420%
5.325 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2012
Release Date
Jun 2023
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Alchemist
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1300 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
2048
40
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
256
-
RT Cores
16
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
83.20 GPixel/s
32.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
166.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.65 TFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.325 TFLOPS
64.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
43W
TDP
95W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Heathrow
GPU Name
DG2-256
Heathrow XT GL
(216-0835033)
GPU Variant
ACM-G12
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
Unknown
123 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
