AMD FirePro M6000 vs Intel Arc A380M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro M6000 and 6GB VRAM Arc A380M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A380M 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2000MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 43W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro M6000
1.024 TFLOPS
Arc A380M
+300%
4.096 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2012
Release Date
Jan 2023
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Alchemist
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.1)
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1550 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
96bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
186.0GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
1024
40
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
128
-
RT Cores
8
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
32.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
64.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1024 GFLOPS
Board Design
43W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Heathrow
GPU Name
DG2-128
Heathrow XT GL
(216-0835033)
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
