AMD FirePro M4150 vs AMD Radeon E9172 MXM
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro M4150 and 2GB VRAM Radeon E9172 MXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro M4150 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 48.00GB/s)
AMD Radeon E9172 MXM 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
Boost Clock1219MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
128 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro M4150
0.549 TFLOPS
Radeon E9172 MXM
+127%
1.248 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2013
Release Date
Oct 2017
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1124 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
48.00GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
512
24
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
5.720 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.50 GPixel/s
17.16 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.01 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1248 GFLOPS
549.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1248 GFLOPS
34.32 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
78.02 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
35W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Opal
GPU Name
Lexa
-
GPU Variant
E9170
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
2.1
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
6.4
