AMD FirePro M4150 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX230
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro M4150 and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX230 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro M4150 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce MX230 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1531MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro M4150
0.549 TFLOPS
GeForce MX230
+42%
0.784 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2013
Release Date
Feb 2019
FirePro Mobile
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1519 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1531 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
48.06GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
384
Shading Units
256
24
TMUs
16
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
5.720 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
24.50 GPixel/s
17.16 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.50 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.25 GFLOPS
549.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
783.9 GFLOPS
34.32 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
24.50 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
10W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Opal
GPU Name
GP108
-
GPU Variant
N17S-G0-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
1.8 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
74 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
6.4
