AMD FirePro M4150 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro M4150 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro M4150
0.549 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
+347%
2.458 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2013
Release Date
Apr 2020
FirePro Mobile
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1035 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
384
Shading Units
1024
24
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
5.720 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.40 GPixel/s
17.16 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.915 TFLOPS
549.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.458 TFLOPS
34.32 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
76.80 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
50W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Opal
GPU Name
TU117
-
GPU Variant
N18P-G62
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
6.6
