AMD FirePro M3100 vs NVIDIA T600 Mobile
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro M3100 and 4GB VRAM T600 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA T600 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 101% (1410MHz vs 700MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro M3100
0.537 TFLOPS
T600 Mobile
+370%
2.527 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Apr 2021
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Turing-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
650 MHz
Base Clock
780 MHz
700 MHz
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
384
Shading Units
896
24
TMUs
56
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
5.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
45.12 GPixel/s
16.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
78.96 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.053 TFLOPS
537.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.527 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
78.96 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
40W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Mars
GPU Name
TU117
Mars M2 LP
(216-0842009)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
6.7
