Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro M3100 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q 8 GB

AMD FirePro M3100 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q 8 GB

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro M3100 and 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Max Q 8 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q 8 GB 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 68% (1177MHz vs 700MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro M3100
0.537 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Max Q 8 GB +1022%
6.026 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Apr 2021
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Ampere-MW
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

650 MHz
Base Clock
607 MHz
700 MHz
Boost Clock
1177 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
20
384
Shading Units
2560
24
TMUs
80
8
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
56.50 GPixel/s
16.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
94.16 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.026 TFLOPS
537.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.026 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
94.16 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
95W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Mars
GPU Name
GA107
Mars M2 LP (216-0842009)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
6.8
© 2025 - TopCPU.net