AMD FirePro M3100 vs AMD Radeon E9260 MXM
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro M3100 and 4GB VRAM Radeon E9260 MXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon E9260 MXM 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 71% (1200MHz vs 700MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro M3100
0.537 TFLOPS
Radeon E9260 MXM
+300%
2.15 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Sep 2016
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
650 MHz
Base Clock
1090 MHz
700 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
14
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
896
24
TMUs
48
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
5.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.20 GPixel/s
16.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.150 TFLOPS
537.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.150 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
134.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
50W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Mars
GPU Name
Baffin
Mars M2 LP
(216-0842009)
GPU Variant
Baffin PRO
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
3 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
2.1
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
6.4
