AMD FirePro M3100 vs AMD FirePro W6150M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro M3100 and 4GB VRAM FirePro W6150M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro M3100 's Advantages
Boost Clock700MHz
AMD FirePro W6150M 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (88.00GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro M3100
0.537 TFLOPS
FirePro W6150M
+207%
1.651 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Nov 2015
FirePro Mobile
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
650 MHz
Base Clock
-
700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
88.00GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
768
24
TMUs
48
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
5.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.20 GPixel/s
16.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
537.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.651 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
103.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Mars
GPU Name
Emerald
Mars M2 LP
(216-0842009)
GPU Variant
Emerald XT GL
(216-0857001)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
2.1
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
-
-
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
6.5
