AMD FirePro M3100 vs Intel Arc Pro A60M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro M3100 and 8GB VRAM Arc Pro A60M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc Pro A60M 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 86% (1300MHz vs 700MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro M3100
0.537 TFLOPS
Arc Pro A60M
+891%
5.325 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Jun 2023
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Alchemist
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
650 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
700 MHz
Boost Clock
1300 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
2048
24
TMUs
128
8
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
256
-
RT Cores
16
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
5.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
83.20 GPixel/s
16.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
166.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.65 TFLOPS
537.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.325 TFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
95W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
Mars
GPU Name
DG2-256
Mars M2 LP
(216-0842009)
GPU Variant
ACM-G12
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
Unknown
77 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
6.6
