AMD FirePro M2000 vs AMD Radeon R7 A260
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro M2000 and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 A260 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro M2000 's Advantages
96 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 A260 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock980MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (57.60GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro M2000
0.48 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 A260
+56%
0.752 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2012
Release Date
Jan 2014
FirePro Mobile
Generation
All-In-One
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
980 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
480
Shading Units
384
24
TMUs
24
8
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
4.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.840 GPixel/s
12.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.52 GTexel/s
-
-
-
480.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
752.6 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
33W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
Turks
GPU Name
Topaz
Turks GL
GPU Variant
Topaz XT
(216-0858020)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
1.55 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
125 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.5
