AMD FirePro M2000 vs AMD Radeon E9550 MXM
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro M2000 and 8GB VRAM Radeon E9550 MXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro M2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (33W vs 95W)
AMD Radeon E9550 MXM 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1266MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
1824 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro M2000
0.48 TFLOPS
Radeon E9550 MXM
+1115%
5.834 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2012
Release Date
Sep 2016
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1120 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1266 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
36
-
-
-
480
Shading Units
2304
24
TMUs
144
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
4.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.51 GPixel/s
12.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
182.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.834 TFLOPS
480.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.834 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
364.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
33W
TDP
95W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Turks
GPU Name
Ellesmere
Turks GL
GPU Variant
Ellesmere XT
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.4
