AMD FirePro M2000 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile Refresh
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro M2000 and 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile Refresh to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro M2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (33W vs 115W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile Refresh 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1455MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (352.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
1824 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro M2000
0.48 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile Refresh
+1296%
6.705 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2012
Release Date
Mar 2020
FirePro Mobile
Generation
GeForce 20 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1260 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1455 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
352.0GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
36
480
Shading Units
2304
24
TMUs
144
8
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
36
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
4.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
93.12 GPixel/s
12.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
209.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
13.41 TFLOPS
480.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.705 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
209.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
33W
TDP
115W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Turks
GPU Name
TU106B
Turks GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.0
Shader Model
6.6
