Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro D500 vs NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation

AMD FirePro D500 vs NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro D500 and 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2250MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 243.8GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 274W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro D500
2.227 TFLOPS
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation +934%
23.04 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
Mar 2023
FirePro
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1725 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2250 MHz
1270 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
192bit
243.8GB/s
Bandwidth
432.0GB/s

Render Config

24
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
40
1536
Shading Units
5120
96
TMUs
160
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
160
-
RT Cores
40
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
144.0 GPixel/s
69.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
360.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
23.04 TFLOPS
2.227 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.04 TFLOPS
556.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
360.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

274W
TDP
100W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
AD104
Tahiti LE GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
© 2025 - TopCPU.net