Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro D300 vs NVIDIA T600

AMD FirePro D300 vs NVIDIA T600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro D300 and 4GB VRAM T600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro D300 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (162.6GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA T600 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1335MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (40W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro D300 +27%
2.176 TFLOPS
T600
1.709 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
Apr 2021
FirePro
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
735 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1335 MHz
1270 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
162.6GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
10
20
Compute Units
-
1280
Shading Units
640
80
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

27.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
42.72 GPixel/s
68.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
53.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.418 TFLOPS
2.176 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.709 TFLOPS
136.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
53.40 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
TU117
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
40W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy