Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro D300 vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

AMD FirePro D300 vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro D300 and 32GB VRAM RTX 5000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro D300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2550MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 162.6GB/s)
11520 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro D300
2.176 TFLOPS
RTX 5000 Ada Generation +2900%
65.28 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
Aug 2023
FirePro
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1155 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2550 MHz
1270 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
162.6GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
100
20
Compute Units
-
1280
Shading Units
12800
80
TMUs
400
32
ROPs
176
-
Tensor Cores
400
-
RT Cores
100
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
72 MB

Theoretical Performance

27.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
448.8 GPixel/s
68.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1020 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
65.28 TFLOPS
2.176 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
65.28 TFLOPS
136.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1020 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
AD102
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
GPU Variant
AD102
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy