Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro D300 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo

AMD FirePro D300 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro D300 and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6800X Duo to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro D300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 400W)
AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1967MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 162.6GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro D300
2.176 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6800X Duo +594%
15.11 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
Aug 2021
FirePro
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
Apple MPX

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1800 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1967 MHz
1270 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
162.6GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
20
Compute Units
60
1280
Shading Units
3840
80
TMUs
240
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
60
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

27.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
188.8 GPixel/s
68.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
472.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
30.21 TFLOPS
2.176 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
15.11 TFLOPS
136.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
944.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
Navi 21
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
GPU Variant
Navi 21 Pro-XLA
GCN 1.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
400W
450 W
Suggested PSU
800 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 4x Thunderbolt
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy