AMD FirePro A320 vs Intel UHD Graphics 32EU
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM FirePro A320 and 0System Shared VRAM UHD Graphics 32EU to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro A320 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 12% (955MHz vs 850MHz)
128 additional rendering cores
Intel UHD Graphics 32EU 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 7 months late
Lower TDP (10W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro A320
+68%
0.733 TFLOPS
UHD Graphics 32EU
0.435 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2012
Release Date
Jan 2021
Trinity
Generation
HD Graphics-M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
Ring Bus
Clock Speeds
800 MHz
Base Clock
350 MHz
955 MHz
Boost Clock
850 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
6
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
256
24
TMUs
16
8
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.640 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.800 GPixel/s
22.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
870.4 GFLOPS
733.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
435.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
108.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
10W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
Devastator
GPU Name
Jasper Lake GT1
A320
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 3
Architecture
Generation 11.0
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
32 nm
Process Size
10 nm+
1.303 billion
Transistors
Unknown
246 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.4
