AMD FirePro A320 vs AMD Radeon Graphics 128SP
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM FirePro A320 and 0System Shared VRAM Radeon Graphics 128SP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro A320 's Advantages
256 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Graphics 128SP 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 130% (2200MHz vs 955MHz)
Lower TDP (15W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro A320
+30%
0.733 TFLOPS
Radeon Graphics 128SP
0.563 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2012
Release Date
Sep 2022
Trinity
Generation
Navi II IGP
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
800 MHz
Base Clock
400 MHz
955 MHz
Boost Clock
2200 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
6
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
128
24
TMUs
8
8
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
2
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.640 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.60 GPixel/s
22.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1126 GFLOPS
733.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
563.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
35.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
15W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Motherboard Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Devastator
GPU Name
Raphael
A320
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 3
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
32 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.303 billion
Transistors
3.4 billion
246 mm²
Die Size
264 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.7
