AMD FirePro A320 vs AMD FirePro A300
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM FirePro A320 and 0System Shared VRAM FirePro A300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro A320 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 6% (955MHz vs 905MHz)
AMD FirePro A300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro A320
+5%
0.733 TFLOPS
FirePro A300
0.695 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2012
Release Date
Jun 2012
Trinity
Generation
Trinity
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
800 MHz
Base Clock
760 MHz
955 MHz
Boost Clock
905 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
6
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
384
24
TMUs
24
8
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.640 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.240 GPixel/s
22.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.72 GTexel/s
-
-
-
733.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
695.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
100W
TDP
65W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
Devastator
GPU Name
Devastator
A320
GPU Variant
A300
TeraScale 3
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
32 nm
Process Size
32 nm
1.303 billion
Transistors
1.303 billion
246 mm²
Die Size
246 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.0
