AMD FirePro A320 vs Intel Arc 140T Mobile
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM FirePro A320 and 0System Shared VRAM Arc 140T Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc 140T Mobile 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 146% (2350MHz vs 955MHz)
640 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro A320
0.733 TFLOPS
Arc 140T Mobile
+556%
4.813 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2012
Release Date
Jan 2025
Trinity
Generation
Arc Graphics-M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
800 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
955 MHz
Boost Clock
2350 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
6
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
1024
24
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
128
-
RT Cores
8
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.640 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
75.20 GPixel/s
22.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
150.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
9.626 TFLOPS
733.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.813 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1203 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
Devastator
GPU Name
Arrow Lake
A320
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 3
Architecture
Xe2-LPG
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
32 nm
Process Size
3 nm
1.303 billion
Transistors
Unknown
246 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.8
