AMD FirePro A300 vs Intel UHD Graphics 16EU Mobile
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM FirePro A300 and 0System Shared VRAM UHD Graphics 16EU Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro A300 's Advantages
256 additional rendering cores
Intel UHD Graphics 16EU Mobile 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 33% (1200MHz vs 905MHz)
Lower TDP (15W vs 65W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro A300
+126%
0.695 TFLOPS
UHD Graphics 16EU Mobile
0.307 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2012
Release Date
Jan 2022
Trinity
Generation
HD Graphics-M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
Ring Bus
Clock Speeds
760 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
905 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
6
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
128
24
TMUs
8
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
8 MB
Theoretical Performance
7.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.800 GPixel/s
21.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
9.600 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
614.4 GFLOPS
695.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
307.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
76.80 GFLOPS
Board Design
65W
TDP
15W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
Devastator
GPU Name
Alder Lake GT1
A300
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 3
Architecture
Generation 12.2
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
32 nm
Process Size
10 nm
1.303 billion
Transistors
Unknown
246 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.6
