AMD FirePro A300 vs NVIDIA Tegra 2 GPU
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM FirePro A300 and 0System Shared VRAM Tegra 2 GPU to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro A300 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 126% (905MHz vs 400MHz)
384 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Tegra 2 GPU 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 65W)
Score
Graphics Card
Jun 2012
Release Date
Jun 2010
Trinity
Generation
Tegra
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
IGP
Clock Speeds
760 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
905 MHz
Boost Clock
400 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
6
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
-
24
TMUs
4
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
21.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
-
-
-
695.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
-
-
-
Board Design
65W
TDP
20W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
Devastator
GPU Name
Tegra 2
A300
GPU Variant
T20MGS-SHP-A3
TeraScale 3
Architecture
VLIW Vec4
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
32 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.303 billion
Transistors
Unknown
246 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.4
OpenGL
ES 2.0
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
-
