ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View vs NVIDIA T400
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View and 2GB VRAM T400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 30W)
NVIDIA T400 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1425MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
304 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
T400
+1267%
1.094 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
May 2021
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
420 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1425 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s
Render Config
1
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
80
Shading Units
384
8
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.80 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
34.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.189 TFLOPS
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1094 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
34.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
17W
TDP
30W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Cedar
GPU Name
TU117
Cedar GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
59 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.0
Shader Model
6.6
