ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View vs ATI Radeon X1650
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (32.00GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
80 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Nov 2007
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
1
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
80
Shading Units
-
8
TMUs
4
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.540 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.540 GTexel/s
-
-
-
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
-
-
-
Board Design
17W
TDP
Unknown
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Cedar
GPU Name
RV516
Cedar GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
40 nm
Process Size
90 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
0.105 billion
59 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.4
OpenGL
2.1
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
3.0
