ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View vs AMD Radeon RX 560D
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View and 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 560D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 65W)
AMD Radeon RX 560D 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1175MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
816 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 560D
+2532%
2.106 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Jul 2017
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1090 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1175 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
1
Compute Units
14
-
-
-
80
Shading Units
896
8
TMUs
56
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
18.80 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
65.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.106 TFLOPS
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.106 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
131.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
17W
TDP
65W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0b
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Cedar
GPU Name
Polaris 21
Cedar GL
GPU Variant
Polaris 21 XL
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
3 billion
59 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.4
