Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View vs AMD Radeon RX 5300 XT

ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View vs AMD Radeon RX 5300 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View and 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 5300 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 100W)
AMD Radeon RX 5300 XT 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1845MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
1328 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 5300 XT +6395%
5.196 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Apr 2010
Release Date
Oct 2019
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1670 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1845 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s

Render Config

1
Compute Units
22
-
-
-
80
Shading Units
1408
8
TMUs
88
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.04 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
162.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.39 TFLOPS
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.196 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
324.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

17W
TDP
100W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Cedar
GPU Name
Navi 14
Cedar GL
GPU Variant
Navi 14 XL
TeraScale 2
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
59 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.5
© 2025 - TopCPU.net