ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View vs AMD Radeon RX 5300
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View and 3GB VRAM Radeon RX 5300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 100W)
AMD Radeon RX 5300 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1645MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
1328 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 5300
+5690%
4.632 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
May 2020
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1327 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1645 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
3GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
96bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
168.0GB/s
Render Config
1
Compute Units
22
-
-
-
80
Shading Units
1408
8
TMUs
88
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.64 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
144.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
9.265 TFLOPS
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.632 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
289.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
17W
TDP
100W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Cedar
GPU Name
Navi 14
Cedar GL
GPU Variant
Navi 14 XE
TeraScale 2
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
59 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.5
